Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Global Connector Industry[2016/10/29]
-
California lawmakers and environmentalists battle plastic bag industry over ban[2016/09/28]
-
2016years UL94v-0 flame rate test report[2016/09/11]
-
Microsoft issues battery fixes for Surface Pro 3 via newest firmware update[2016/11/10]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]